Current:Home > reviewsGOP lawmakers ask Wisconsin Supreme Court to reconsider redistricting ruling, schedule for new maps -VisionFunds
GOP lawmakers ask Wisconsin Supreme Court to reconsider redistricting ruling, schedule for new maps
View
Date:2025-04-12 21:44:52
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Republican lawmakers have asked the Wisconsin Supreme Court to stay and reconsider its finding that the state’s legislative district boundaries are unconstitutional.
Attorneys representing a host of Republican state Senators filed a motion with the court Thursday saying they can’t meet the court’s Jan. 12 deadline for new maps. They also argue the court didn’t listen to their arguments in the case and didn’t give them a chance to respond to the deadline for new boundaries. They asked the court to stay all proceedings until it decides on the motion.
The legislative electoral maps drawn by the Republican-controlled Legislature in 2011 cemented the party’s majorities, which now stand at 64-35 in the Assembly and a 22-11 supermajority in the Senate.
Democrats filed a lawsuit in August arguing the maps are unconstitutional and give the GOP an unfair advantage. They filed the action a day after liberal Justice Janet Protasiewicz was sworn in, flipping the court’s majority to 4-3 liberal control.
The court ruled on Dec. 22 that the current boundaries are unconstitutional because they aren’t contiguous. Many districts include sections of land that aren’t connected, resulting in maps that resemble Swiss cheese.
The court ordered the Legislature and other parties involved in the lawsuit to produce new maps by Jan. 12, with supporting arguments due 10 days later. The court likely will release new maps sometime in late February or early March unless the Legislature acts first.
State elections officials have said maps must be in place by March 15 to be in play for the 2024 election.
veryGood! (568)
Related
- DoorDash steps up driver ID checks after traffic safety complaints
- FAA ramps up oversight of Boeing's manufacturing procedures
- The Supreme Court will decide whether local anti-homeless laws are ‘cruel and unusual’
- 'Highest quality beef:' Mark Zuckerberg's cattle to get beer and macadamia nuts in Hawaii
- Backstage at New York's Jingle Ball with Jimmy Fallon, 'Queer Eye' and Meghan Trainor
- Halle Bailey’s Boyfriend DDG Says She’s Already a “Professional Mom”
- American Petroleum Institute Plans Election-Year Blitz in the Face of Climate Policy Pressure
- Wait, did Florida ban the dictionary? Why one county is pulling Merriam-Webster from shelves
- Brianna LaPaglia Reveals The Meaning Behind Her "Chickenfry" Nickname
- Emma Stone applies to be on regular 'Jeopardy!' every year: 'I want to earn my stripes'
Ranking
- Have Dry, Sensitive Skin? You Need To Add These Gentle Skincare Products to Your Routine
- Advocates Welcome EPA’s Proposed Pollution Restrictions On Trash Incineration. But Environmental Justice Concerns Remain.
- Family sues school district over law that bans transgender volleyball player from girls’ sports
- DOJ seeks death penalty for man charged in racist mass shooting at grocery store in Buffalo
- The Daily Money: Spending more on holiday travel?
- Midwest braces for winter storm today. Here's how much snow will fall and when, according to weather forecasts
- Mass shooting at Buffalo supermarket now Justice Department’s first death penalty case under Garland
- California driving instructor accused of molesting and recording students, teen girls
Recommendation
Questlove charts 50 years of SNL musical hits (and misses)
Google layoffs 2024: Hundreds of employees on hardware, engineering teams lose jobs
The Supreme Court will decide whether local anti-homeless laws are ‘cruel and unusual’
Grubhub agrees to a $3.5 million settlement with Massachusetts for fees charged during the pandemic
Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
American Petroleum Institute Plans Election-Year Blitz in the Face of Climate Policy Pressure
Michael J. Fox explains why 'Parkinson's has been a gift' at National Board of Review gala
Supreme Court agrees to hear Starbucks appeal in Memphis union case