Current:Home > MyFTC wants to ban fake product reviews, warning that AI could make things worse -VisionFunds
FTC wants to ban fake product reviews, warning that AI could make things worse
Ethermac View
Date:2025-04-06 16:05:51
If the Federal Trade Commission has its way, businesses could soon be fined a hefty sum for hosting or promoting fake product reviews online.
Faux five-star and rave reviews of less-than-stellar consumer goods can boost businesses' profits while deceiving consumers, according to the agency, which has proposed a rule to crack down on companies that buy, sell or promote phony user ratings of their products. If the rule is finalized, violators would be subject to penalties of up to $50,000 per infraction, depending on the case.
"The FTC has seen a massive increase in online reviews in the past few years," Serena Viswanathan, associate director of the FTC's division of ad practices, told CBS News. "We're all using them now to make decisions on whether to buy a product, where to stay on vacation. But unfortunately, with the rise in online reviews we have seen that bad actors can manipulate or fake reviews to deceive consumers for their own benefit."
New types of artificial intelligence tools, which can write human-sounding, but bogus, product reviews, also threaten to compound the problem by enabling bad actors to crank out far more fake reviews, according to the consumer watchdog.
Deceptive reviews hurt consumers by making it hard to obtain factual information about products, regulators say.
"The FTC's proposed rule would make it crystal clear that it's illegal to do things like write or sell fake reviews from people who don't exist or never used the product, or to buy positive reviews or even buy negative reviews about your competitors," Viswanathan said.
Boosting "honest companies"
A steady stream of phony product reviews can boost an item's visibility among consumers while obscuring products from more trustworthy companies, according to experts.
"Our proposed rule on fake reviews shows that we're using all available means to attack deceptive advertising in the digital age," said Samuel Levine, Director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection said in a statement. "The rule would trigger civil penalties for violators and should help level the playing field for honest companies."
According to a U.S. PIRG estimate, between 30% and 40% of online reviews are "concocted or are in some way not genuine." Bogus reviews surged during the pandemic when U.S. shoppers made the bulk of their purchases over the internet versus in stores, the consumer advocacy group noted.
Nearly 90% of online shoppers rely on reviews to guide their purchase decisions, according to PIRG.
"Not only does this harm consumers who are trying to make informed buying decisions, fake reviews also hurt honest businesses who make sure their online reviews are genuine. When people lose confidence in reviews, legitimate positive reviews don't mean as much. So consumers lose. Honest businesses lose. Dishonest businesses win," PIRG said in a report.
Stopping hijackers
The FTC's proposed rule would make selling and buying fake reviews illegal, while also cracking down on a practice known as "review hijacking." This consists of repurposing a genuine consumer review written for one product so that it appears to pertain to a substantially different product.
Also under the proposed enforcement, company insiders cannot review their own products, and businesses cannot bribe people to leave positive reviews or threaten them if they leave negative reviews. Companies would be permitted to offer customers gift cards for leaving a review, so long as the business doesn't dictate what people say about a product.
"We really think that the possibility of significant financial penalties under a rule should make some of these bad actors think twice about writing fake reviews and selling fake reviews," Viswanathan said.
veryGood! (3373)
Related
- Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
- Wisconsin Supreme Court refuses to reconsider ruling ordering new legislative maps
- Who are the Houthis and why did the US and UK retaliate for their attacks on ships in the Red Sea?
- Golden Globes Host Jo Koy Doubles Down on Intent Behind Taylor Swift Joke
- South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
- See Drew Barrymore’s Tearful Message to Adam Sandler After Watching The Wedding Singer
- Palestinian viewers are captivated and moved by case at UN’s top court accusing Israel of genocide
- Ozzy Osbourne praises T-Pain's version of Black Sabbath's 'War Pigs': 'The best cover'
- The Super Bowl could end in a 'three
- AP Week in Pictures: Asia
Ranking
- 2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
- Fruit Stripe Gum to bite the dust after a half century of highly abbreviated rainbow flavors
- The war in Gaza has taken an economic toll on tech, Israel's most productive sector
- Texas blocks federal border agents from processing migrants in Eagle Pass public park
- Trump's 'stop
- Maine man pleads guilty in New Year’s Eve machete attack near Times Square
- Average long-term mortgage rates rise again, reaching their highest level in 4 weeks
- Apple announces release date for Vision Pro: What it costs, how to buy and more
Recommendation
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Nick Saban explains why he decided to retire as Alabama head football coach
New York City schools feeling strain of migrant surge
The Excerpt podcast: Can abandoned coal mines bring back biodiversity to an area?
Jamie Foxx gets stitches after a glass is thrown at him during dinner in Beverly Hills
Judy Blume to receive lifetime achievement award for ‘Bravery in Literature’
US Virgin Islands announces it will build its first artificial reef to protect itself from storms
Ronnie Long's wrongful conviction is shocking — Unless you study the US justice system