Current:Home > MyWithout Social Security reform Americans in retirement may lose big, report says -VisionFunds
Without Social Security reform Americans in retirement may lose big, report says
View
Date:2025-04-11 20:25:31
How would you feel if you and your spouse lost $16,500 in income a year?
That's how much a typical dual-income couple is estimated to lose in Social Security benefits if they retire when the Social Security Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) trust fund is depleted in 2033, the nonprofit, nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) said in a new report Thursday. A typical single-income couple would lose $12,400, it said.
Since Social Security is currently paying out more benefits than it's collecting in payroll tax and other revenue, the program is drawing down its reserves in the OASI trust fund to cover the remaining cost of benefits. The fund only has enough reserves to cover 100% of benefits until the fund's reserves are depleted in 2033. When that happens, the law limits benefits to incoming revenue, which essentially mandates a 21% across-the-board benefit cut for the program’s 70 million beneficiaries, CRFB said.
"Former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris have both said they would “protect” the Social Security program," CRFB said. "However, neither has put forward a plan to meaningfully do so."
Who will be the biggest losers?
Low-income, dual-income couples retiring in 2033 would lose $10,000 in benefits, compared with $21,800 for a high-income couple, CRFB said.
"Although the cut for a low-income couple would be smaller and reflect a 21% reduction in their benefits, the cut would be a larger share of their income," it noted.
Social Security benefits rollercoaster:2025 COLA estimate dips with inflation, but high daily expenses still burn seniors
It'll get worse over time, too
If the government doesn't reform the program, the gap between revenues and benefits paid out will continue to widen, CRFB said. The 21% cut across the board in 2033 will deepen to a 31% cut by 2098, it said.
If Trump also executes his plan to stop taxing Social Security without a plan to fully replace that revenue, the program would be further hamstrung, CRFB said.
Currently, only seniors who earn less than $25,000 per year ($32,000 for married couples) of “combined income" don't pay taxes on Social Security benefits. Combined income is equal to your adjusted gross income, plus nontaxable interest from instruments like municipal bond investments, plus half of your Social Security benefit.
This year, taxation of benefits is projected to raise about $94 billion, CRFB estimated.
Trump's change would make Social Security’s retirement trust fund insolvent more thanone year earlier – in early 2032 instead of late 2033 -- and the initial 21% cut across the board would deepen to a 25% cut, CRFB said.
“Vague political promises not to touch Social Security benefits are meaningless,” said Mary Johnson, a retired analyst for the nonprofit Senior Citizens League, last month. “Voters need to be shown where the money is coming from to pay our benefits."
Medora Lee is a money, markets, and personal finance reporter at USA TODAY. You can reach her at [email protected] and subscribe to our free Daily Money newsletter for personal finance tips and business news every Monday through Friday morning.
veryGood! (5)
Related
- Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
- Poland accuses Germany of meddling its its affairs by seeking answers on alleged visa scheme
- Why the US job market has defied rising interest rates and expectations of high unemployment
- Woman's body found in jaws of Florida alligator
- Nearly 400 USAID contract employees laid off in wake of Trump's 'stop work' order
- Hollywood writers reach a tentative deal with studios after nearly five month strike
- 'The Amazing Race' 2023 premiere: Season 35 cast, start date, time, how to watch
- Misery Index message for Ole Miss' Lane Kiffin: Maybe troll less, coach more
- Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
- Biden tells Zelenskyy U.S. will provide Ukraine with ATACMS long-range missiles
Ranking
- Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
- US border agency chief meets with authorities in Mexico over migrant surge
- Horoscopes Today, September 23, 2023
- Political neophyte Stefanos Kasselakis elected new leader of Greece’s main opposition Syriza party
- The FBI should have done more to collect intelligence before the Capitol riot, watchdog finds
- 3 crocodiles could have easily devoured a stray dog in their river. They pushed it to safety instead.
- Savings account interest rates are best in years, experts say. How to get a high yield.
- Safety Haley Van Voorhis becomes first woman non-kicker to play in NCAA football game
Recommendation
Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
Ukraine air force chief mocks Moscow as missile hits key Russian navy base in Sevastopol, Crimea
Scientific dynamic duo aims to stop the next pandemic before it starts
'Goodness wins out': The Miss Gay America pageant's 50-year journey to an Arkansas theater
Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
Gisele Bündchen says her life is 'liberating' after battling destructive thoughts as a model
'We just collapsed:' Reds' postseason hopes take hit with historic meltdown
Wait, who dies in 'Expendables 4'? That explosive ending explained. (Spoilers!)