Current:Home > reviewsJudge rejects effort to dismiss Trump Georgia case on First Amendment grounds -VisionFunds
Judge rejects effort to dismiss Trump Georgia case on First Amendment grounds
Burley Garcia View
Date:2025-04-06 13:12:46
A Georgia judge on Thursday denied an effort by former President Donald Trump and 14 others to dismiss the 2020 election-related case in Fulton County, ruling that the First Amendment does not protect the defendants from prosecution.
In a 14-page order, Judge Scott McAfee rejected the argument put forth by the defendants that the charges violate the First Amendment's protections of political speech and the right to petition Congress.
"[F]ree speech — including political speech — is not without restriction," McAfee wrote. "These excluded categories include speech integral to criminal conduct, fraud, or speech presenting an imminent threat that the Government can prevent."
Trump and 18 other co-defendants were indicted last year on state charges by a grand jury in Fulton County, the culmination of an investigation by District Attorney Fani Willis and her office. Prosecutors alleged the defendants worked to overturn the election results in Georgia after Trump lost the state in 2020. Trump and most of the other defendants have pleaded not guilty and denied wrongdoing, while several others have taken plea deals.
The former president faces 10 felony charges. McAfee dismissed three against him in an earlier decision.
Defense attorneys challenged the state laws underpinning the charges, saying the alleged violations were protected political speech. McAfee ruled that the First Amendment's protections do not apply, since the speech in question is "alleged to have been made in furtherance of criminal activity."
"Even core political speech addressing matters of public concern is not impenetrable from prosecution if allegedly used to further criminal activity," the judge wrote.
Steve Sadow, an attorney for Trump, said the defendants "respectfully disagree with Judge McAfee's order and will continue to evaluate their options regarding the First Amendment challenges." Sadow noted that McAfee left the door open for the defendants to raise the First Amendment issue further down the line.
In his order, McAfee said only a jury can resolve whether Trump and his allies' speech or conduct "was carried out with criminal intent," as prosecutors have claimed.
Still, he added that "accepting the allegations as true for the purposes of this pretrial challenge, as the court must, the speech alleged in this indictment is integral to criminal conduct and categorically excluded from First Amendment protections."
McAfee said defense attorneys have not presented "any authority that the speech and conduct alleged" is constitutionally protected political speech.
The sprawling racketeering case brought by Willis and her office has picked back up after an effort spearheaded by one of Trump's co-defendants to disqualify the district attorney from the prosecution derailed it for several weeks.
Michael Roman, a longtime GOP operative, accused Willis of engaging in an improper romantic relationship with one of her deputies, Nathan Wade, and alleged she financially benefited from it. Trump and seven others joined Roman's bid to remove Willis and the district attorney's office from the case, but McAfee ultimately declined to do so.
The judge instead said Willis could remain on the case so long as Wade resigned, which he did on the heels of McAfee's decision.
Willis and Wade acknowledged they were romantically involved, but said their relationship began after Wade was hired in November 2021 to work on the case involving Trump. They both forcefully denied wrongdoing, but the allegations cast a shadow over the prosecution.
The former president and the seven co-defendants asked the Georgia Court of Appeals last week to review McAfee's decision not to disqualify Willis and her office. The court has 45 days to decide whether to hear the appeal.
The Georgia case is one of four criminal prosecutions brought against the former president. A trial in Manhattan, where Trump faces 34 felony counts for falsifying business records, is set to begin this month.
His conduct surrounding the 2020 election also led to federal charges in Washington, D.C., brought by special counsel Jack Smith. The fourth prosecution, also brought by Smith in federal court in South Florida, stems from Trump's alleged mishandling of sensitive government documents after he left the White House in January 2021.
Trump has pleaded not guilty to all charges and has claimed that the prosecutions are politically motivated.
Melissa QuinnMelissa Quinn is a politics reporter for CBSNews.com. She has written for outlets including the Washington Examiner, Daily Signal and Alexandria Times. Melissa covers U.S. politics, with a focus on the Supreme Court and federal courts.
TwitterveryGood! (5571)
Related
- Most popular books of the week: See what topped USA TODAY's bestselling books list
- Video shows moment police arrest Duane Keffe D Davis for murder of Tupac Shakur
- Caretaker of Dominican cemetery where bodies of six newborns were found turns himself in
- Japan auteur Yamada sticks to exploring the human condition after 90 films
- Don't let hackers fool you with a 'scam
- Francesca Scorsese Quizzing Dad Martin Scorsese on Modern Slang Is TikTok Magic
- Chiefs star Travis Kelce on Aaron Rodgers' 'Mr. Pfizer' jab: I'm 'comfortable' with it
- China’s flagging economy gets a temporary boost as holiday travel returns to pre-pandemic levels
- 2 killed, 3 injured in shooting at makeshift club in Houston
- On ‘Carolyn’s Boy,’ Darius Rucker pays loving tribute to his greatest inspiration: his late mother
Ranking
- The FBI should have done more to collect intelligence before the Capitol riot, watchdog finds
- Mississippi Democrat Brandon Presley aims to rally Black voters in governor’s race
- Chrissy Metz and Bradley Collins Break Up After 3 Years
- Former Tropical Storm Philippe’s remnants headed to waterlogged New England and Atlantic Canada
- Selena Gomez's "Weird Uncles" Steve Martin and Martin Short React to Her Engagement
- Federal judge in Oklahoma clears the way for a ban on medical care for transgender young people
- Deaf truck driver awarded $36M by a jury for discrimination
- India flash flooding death toll climbs after a glacial lake burst that scientists had warned about for years
Recommendation
Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
Garlic is in so many of our favorite foods, but is it good for you?
Troopers who fatally shot Cop City activist near Atlanta won't be charged, prosecutor says
It's Fat Bear Week - but our fascination with bears is timeless
At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
2nd suspect arraigned in shooting that claimed life of baby delivered after mother was shot on bus
What's Making Us Happy: A guide to your weekend viewing and listening
ACLU sues a Tennessee city over an anti-drag ordinance