Current:Home > ContactCourt revives Sarah Palin’s libel lawsuit against The New York Times -VisionFunds
Court revives Sarah Palin’s libel lawsuit against The New York Times
View
Date:2025-04-14 21:41:26
NEW YORK (AP) — A federal appeals court revived Sarah Palin’s libel case against The New York Times on Wednesday, citing errors by a lower court judge, particularly his decision to dismiss the lawsuit while a jury was deliberating.
The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan wrote that Judge Jed S. Rakoff’s decision in February 2022 to dismiss the lawsuit mid-deliberations improperly intruded on the jury’s work.
It also found that the erroneous exclusion of evidence, an inaccurate jury instruction and an erroneous response to a question from the jury tainted the jury’s decision to rule against Palin. It declined, however, to grant Palin’s request to force Rakoff off the case on grounds he was biased against her. The 2nd Circuit said she had offered no proof.
The libel lawsuit by Palin, a onetime Republican vice presidential candidate and former governor of Alaska, centered on the newspaper’s 2017 editorial falsely linking her campaign rhetoric to a mass shooting, which Palin asserted damaged her reputation and career.
The Times acknowledged its editorial was inaccurate but said it quickly corrected errors it called an “honest mistake” that were never meant to harm Palin.
Shane Vogt, a lawyer for Palin, said he was reviewing the opinion.
Charlie Stadtlander, a spokesperson for the Times, said the decision was disappointing. “We’re confident we will prevail in a retrial,” he said in an email.
The 2nd Circuit, in a ruling written by Judge John M. Walker Jr., reversed the jury verdict, along with Rakoff’s decision to dismiss the lawsuit while jurors were deliberating.
Despite his ruling, Rakoff let jurors finish deliberating and render their verdict, which went against Palin.
The appeals court noted that Rakoff’s ruling made credibility determinations, weighed evidence, and ignored facts or inferences that a reasonable juror could plausibly find supported Palin’s case.
It also described how “push notifications” that reached the cellphones of jurors “came as an unfortunate surprise to the district judge.” The 2nd Circuit said it was not enough that the judge’s law clerk was assured by jurors that Rakoff’s ruling had not affected their deliberations.
“Given a judge’s special position of influence with a jury, we think a jury’s verdict reached with the knowledge of the judge’s already-announced disposition of the case will rarely be untainted, no matter what the jurors say upon subsequent inquiry,” the appeals court said.
In its ruling Wednesday, the 2nd Circuit said it was granting a new trial because of various trial errors and because Rakoff’s mid-deliberations ruling against Palin, which might have reached jurors through alerts delivered to cell phones, “impugn the reliability of that verdict.”
“The jury is sacrosanct in our legal system, and we have a duty to protect its constitutional role, both by ensuring that the jury’s role is not usurped by judges and by making certain that juries are provided with relevant proffered evidence and properly instructed on the law,” the appeals court said.
veryGood! (8524)
Related
- North Carolina trustees approve Bill Belichick’s deal ahead of introductory news conference
- Lawsuit says Ohio’s gender-affirming care ban violates the state constitution
- Kristen Doute's Nipple-Pinching Drama on The Valley Explained
- Singer Duffy Breaks 3-Year Social Media Silence After Detailing Rape and Kidnapping
- Tree trimmer dead after getting caught in wood chipper at Florida town hall
- I've been fighting cancer for years. I know what's in store for Princess Kate.
- How to watch surprise 5th episode of 'Quiet on Set' featuring Drake Bell and other stars
- 3 moves to make a month before your retirement
- Will the 'Yellowstone' finale be the last episode? What we know about Season 6, spinoffs
- Costco food court: If you aren't a member it may mean no more $1.50 hot dogs for you
Ranking
- Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
- Former Chiefs Cheerleader Krystal Anderson Dies Days After Stillbirth
- Costco is cracking down on its food court. You now need to show your membership card to eat there.
- Convicted sex offender who hacked jumbotron at the Jacksonville Jaguars’ stadium gets 220 years
- Former Danish minister for Greenland discusses Trump's push to acquire island
- Sean “Diddy” Combs Breaks Silence After Federal Agents Raid His Homes
- California Restaurant Association says Berkeley to halt ban on natural gas piping in new buildings
- Zendaya's Hairstylist Ursula Stephen Reveals the All-Star Details Behind Her Blonde Transformation
Recommendation
McConnell absent from Senate on Thursday as he recovers from fall in Capitol
How will the Baltimore bridge collapse affect deliveries? What to know after ship collision
Who should be the NBA MVP? Making the case for the top 6 candidates
North Carolina elections board finalizes results from primary marked by new voter ID rules
2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
California Restaurant Association says Berkeley to halt ban on natural gas piping in new buildings
'No ordinary bridge': What made the Francis Scott Key Bridge a historic wonder
A giant ship. A power blackout. A scramble to stop traffic: How Baltimore bridge collapsed